Shopping Cart
Your Cart is Empty
There was an error with PayPalClick here to try again
CelebrateThank you for your business!You should be receiving an order confirmation from Paypal shortly.Exit Shopping Cart

Psychology Research...Unraveled


P.I.E. Blog


You're Such a Vagina!

Posted on April 17, 2013 at 11:02 PM Comments comments (168)
Some call them 'ladies,' while others call them 'women.' You may hear an immature man refer to them as 'chicks' or 'babes.' There's a new term to add to the list. According to Peter Hansen, a state legislator from New Hampshire, women are 'vaginas.' Yup, 'vaginas.' 

What prompted the legislator to call women 'vaginas?' Mr. Hansen (and the 'Mr.' is applied very loosely here) was responding to another legislator's speech. In that speech, an unnamed legislator mentioned that he was able to remove himself from a dangerous situation without using deadly force. 

Mr. Hansen, a proponent of the right to use guns for self defense, responded to that speech in email saying, "There were two critical ingredients missing in the illustrious stories purporting to demonstrate the practical side of retreat. Not that retreat may not be possible mind you. What could possibly be missing from those factual tales of successful retreat in VT, Germany, and the bowels of Amsterdam? Why children and vagina's of course. While the tales relate the actions of a solitary male the outcome cannot relate to similar situations where children and women and mothers are the potential victims."

Let's start with the superficial aspects of this situation. His argument is a simple one. It would be much easier for a man acting alone to get himself to safety as opposed to a man who may be protecting his family (hence the 'children and vaginas' comment). It's a shame that Mr. Hansen tries to use the English language in such a ridiculous way. It may be helpful for him to find ways of writing that are more relatable. In other words, Mr. Hansen, keep your words like your kisses...short and sweet.

Now to the deeper issue of his offensive and rude comment. According to the legislator, he was trying to get a rise out of people. Congratulations! You win! It's too bad that your parting gift is a fist full of shame and a call for resignation by NARAL-Pro Choice New Hampshire. Even the Republican Party Chairwoman from New Hampshire called him on his comment.

What Mr. Hansen fails to see is that this term diminishes all of the accomplishments that women have made and the qualities that they possess. Mr. Hansen, did you know what that women have brains and ideas? Women also come with compassion and empathy for others (although not for you at this moment). Women are persistent, motivated and industrious. Women create and run their own businesses every day. Yes, women are a lot of things, and his comment boils all women down to just one thing, their private parts.

His comments have demonstrated what psychologists call an implicit bias. In other words, although he didn't plainly express his sexist ideas (known as an explicit bias), he implied that women are nothing more than vaginas. One of the interesting things that we know about implicit biases is that they influence us just as much as the biases that we know about. 

You know how you say something and immediately realize that it was in poor taste? Too bad Mr. Hansen didn't have this experience. He actually defended his comments the next day pointing out that his words weren't offensive, and they were taken out of context. It wasn't until two days after his original comment that he conceded and apologized calling his comments ""blatantly offensive, insensitive, and frankly, stupid language." 

Wonder if Mr. Hansen realizes how much of a $%@! he's being by calling women vaginas?

Psychology IEverywhere!

If You Have Mental Illness, You Can't Apply!

Posted on April 10, 2013 at 12:32 PM Comments comments (16)
Senator Mitch McConnell, a republican from Kentucky, is in the news this morning for being a "victim" of an unauthorized recording in his private strategy room. Mother Jones, a news outlet that features “investigative, political, and social justice reporting,” released audio tapes of Senator McConnell’s attack against Ashley Judd, a prospective challenger for his senate seat in the next Kentucky State election.
The senator’s plan was simple—expose Ashley Judd, a Hollywood actress, feminist and humanitarian, for being emotionally unbalanced and erratic. The tapes feature his staff talking about her admitted mental illness as a viable strategy for proving this point. The topic of discussion heard on the tapes extends from her 6-week stay in a hospital because of psychological issues in the 90’s to her religious beliefs.
Whatever plans Senator McConnell made have been foiled thanks to these tapes. While the senator, who has served in the U.S. Senate for the last 29 years, is concerned about who made the tapes, you have to wonder about the integrity of a man who believes that someone’s mental history is fair political game. Does Senator McConnell know that over 17 million Americans deal with depression every day? Does the senator know that women are twice as likely to suffer from depression as men, which makes his political tactics not only grimy, but sexist?
One of the goals of is to decrease the stigma associated with mental illness and raise awareness for mental health issues. Senator McConnell’s plan is in direct conflict with those goals. Might I add that shares these goals with some very important mental health organizations like the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), American Psychological Association (APA), Mental Health America (MHA), American Mental Health Counselors Association (AMHCA) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA). All of these organizations have thousands of members, thus some considerable political power.  
What makes Ashley Judd, a woman stable enough to star in 20 Hollywood films, several television shows and two Broadway shows, unfit to run against Senator McConnell? Is it the thousands of fans that she has throughout the state of Kentucky that may actually vote for her? Is it her down to earth quality that makes others relate to her?
I have to wonder if the Senator has ever considered that, with so many Americans struggling with mental illness (over 60 million), isn’t it highly possible that our Congress is made up of mentally-ill people? You can’t tell me that, out of the 535 elected officials (100 senators and 435 representatives), American citizens have managed to vote for the most psychologically-healthy people we could find.
From the senator’s poor, little, slanted view, he is the victim. However, in the psychology world, he is a scared bully who is grabbing at straws to save his political career. Even though Judd decided not to run, it looks like she stayed in the race just long enough to unveil the heart of McConnell.
I wonder if he has started a campaign to have segegrated water fountains at Capitol Hill..."For Mentally-Healthy Only."

Psychology IEverywhere!